<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Under attack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:19:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanc</title>
		<link>http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23838</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23838</guid>
		<description>This is a perfect example of why a greytrap (like OpenBSD&#039;s spamd) is good to sit in front of your actual MTA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a perfect example of why a greytrap (like OpenBSD&#8217;s spamd) is good to sit in front of your actual MTA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RubenV</title>
		<link>http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23829</link>
		<dc:creator>RubenV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 11:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23829</guid>
		<description>Oh, thanks for pointing out bkor! Turns out, I still had soft_bounce enabled from when I was testing my new spam setup a few weeks ago.

Yanko: That makes sense. The internet is such a pile of dirt :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, thanks for pointing out bkor! Turns out, I still had soft_bounce enabled from when I was testing my new spam setup a few weeks ago.</p>
<p>Yanko: That makes sense. The internet is such a pile of dirt :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yanko</title>
		<link>http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23824</link>
		<dc:creator>Yanko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 07:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23824</guid>
		<description>These are most likely bounces for spam some botnet is sending with random@yourdomain return addresses. Thus the hosts you are banning are likely legitimate, but relatively unprotected mail servers.
&quot;Attack&quot; is probably not an accurate description. Its just a regular fare for botnets with huge lists of domains to crap over. Usually at random.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are most likely bounces for spam some botnet is sending with random@yourdomain return addresses. Thus the hosts you are banning are likely legitimate, but relatively unprotected mail servers.<br />
&#8220;Attack&#8221; is probably not an accurate description. Its just a regular fare for botnets with huge lists of domains to crap over. Usually at random.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkor</title>
		<link>http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23820</link>
		<dc:creator>bkor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weblog.savanne.be/171-under-attack#comment-23820</guid>
		<description>At least properly reject them... stuff like:

unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550
unknown_address_reject_code = 550
unknown_client_reject_code = 550</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least properly reject them&#8230; stuff like:</p>
<p>unknown_local_recipient_reject_code = 550<br />
unknown_address_reject_code = 550<br />
unknown_client_reject_code = 550</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

